Bios can't be right
-
by Traceydix
Just got a pic labelled 2007 08 22. Clear pic of condor with tag 78 on black with two dots which I faithfully record. Bio then says this is 478 hatched in 2008. This cannot possibly be the right bird.
Posted
-
by myraf scientist
Thank you for your comment - we are working on fixing any miss-classifications from the tags to the condors. If you come across another photo where you think the bio is not correct can you tag the photo so we can see it for following-up? In the meantime, we will look into the tag conversion of 78 and see what might have happened.
Posted
-
by Traceydix
Thank you
Posted
-
by BirdGrrl scientist in response to Traceydix's comment.
Here's an example that Traceydix found later...
http://talk.condorwatch.org/#/subjects/ACW00013ky
Says #12 died the year before the photo was taken....Posted
-
by kimaire
Here's another one: http://www.condorwatch.org/subjects/standard/534c415dd31eae0543020c63.JPG
I labeled the left condor as 64 black, which came up as http://www.condorwatch.org/#/condors/364. Bio says she died April 21, 2011, picture is dated December 15, 2011.
Posted
-
by CosmicLatte
http://talk.condorwatch.org/#/subjects/ACW0004zrp "Identified" condors 602 and 238, one of which died before the image date and the other of which was born after.
And another http://talk.condorwatch.org/#/subjects/ACW00051im featuring the apparent zombie of 238.
Condor 238 seems to have some unfinished business here on Earth. http://talk.condorwatch.org/#/subjects/ACW0004kbe
Condor 336 died before image date. http://talk.condorwatch.org/#/subjects/ACW000132x
Posted